Olympic hockey thread

Steve Simmons Not Allowed
Message
Author
User avatar
sutterfamily
Posts: 805
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:46 am

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#141 Post by sutterfamily »

CAN women looking better than they have all tournament.
User avatar
sutterfamily
Posts: 805
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:46 am

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#142 Post by sutterfamily »

nice shorty
User avatar
Grand Moff Larkin
Site Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#143 Post by Grand Moff Larkin »

Now Canadians like stanchions
practice
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#144 Post by practice »

sutterfamily wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 1:43 pm CAN women looking better than they have all tournament.
Yeah they've been great. Gonna be a long 20 mins
User avatar
Grand Moff Larkin
Site Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#145 Post by Grand Moff Larkin »

The US keeps doing real pointless dumps when they have the puck in the neutral zone
User avatar
Grand Moff Larkin
Site Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#146 Post by Grand Moff Larkin »

Yikes major review
User avatar
Grand Moff Larkin
Site Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#147 Post by Grand Moff Larkin »

Minor is manageable

Glad Stacey didn’t draw a call a few seconds earlier, that was a dive
User avatar
Grand Moff Larkin
Site Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#148 Post by Grand Moff Larkin »

U S A! U S A!
User avatar
Grand Moff Larkin
Site Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#149 Post by Grand Moff Larkin »

Grand Moff Larkin wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 3:28 pm U S A! U S A!
U S A! U S A!
User avatar
nick
Posts: 387
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:59 am

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#150 Post by nick »

Grand Moff Larkin wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 3:20 pm Yikes major review
really seemed like that was a hit on the numbers into the boards boucher
practice
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#151 Post by practice »

Gutted for the gals. I guess Canada got away with a hook/slash on the Necas break yesterday but Murphy's hook was right on the hands on that early breakaway in OT.
User avatar
Cacophony
Posts: 720
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:13 pm
Location: Fargoh

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#152 Post by Cacophony »

Out ladies are the best sorry
practice
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#153 Post by practice »

My main grievance is with the faceoff before the tying goal. US player got dumped or fell off a rush and slid into the end boards, puck ends up underneath her, and the ref blows the play dead immediately for an offensive zone faceoff that allows them to pull the goalie. I think most refs let the play run for at least a few seconds there, and the puck most likely gets worked loose. But if not why should it result in an offensive zone faceoff? The US player caused the play to stop. It should go outside. Right? Am I right?
Last edited by practice on Thu Feb 19, 2026 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
practice
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#154 Post by practice »

Please
practice
Posts: 1085
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#155 Post by practice »

nick wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 4:03 pm
Grand Moff Larkin wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 3:20 pm Yikes major review
really seemed like that was a hit on the numbers into the boards boucher
I thought 2 was the right call. Canada then pissed away 80 percent of that PP, almost gave up a couple shorthanded chances, before working that open look in the slot for MPP who fanned on it.
User avatar
Grand Moff Larkin
Site Admin
Posts: 6646
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Olympic hockey thread

#156 Post by Grand Moff Larkin »

practice wrote: Thu Feb 19, 2026 5:39 pm My main grievance is with the faceoff before the tying goal. US player got dumped or fell off a rush and slid into the end boards, puck ends up underneath her, and the ref blows the play dead immediately for an offensive zone faceoff that allows them to pull the goalie. I think most refs let the play run for at least a few seconds there, and the puck most likely gets worked loose. But if not why should it result in an offensive zone faceoff? The US player caused the play to stop. It should go outside. Right? Am I right?
Pretty sure she got dumped by a Canadian player, so I’m fine with the faceoff being in the zone. I was glad they blew the whistle because she was fully down and getting hard pokes from a Canadian stick.
Post Reply