2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

Steve Simmons Not Allowed
Message
Author
2PEENZ
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2024 2:11 pm

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#101 Post by 2PEENZ »

Yeah 25min/night minute muncher, never injured, good for 30pts. He's just wildly overpaid. Oilers might have to retain $2MM or take back a somewhat less bad contract but he'll move I'm pretty sure.
2PEENZ
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Mar 31, 2024 2:11 pm

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#102 Post by 2PEENZ »

I've wanted him gone for a while, but the Oil will have a hole without him no doubt. Hopefully they use that ~$7MM in savings on a cheaper 4-5 dman and useful bottom 6 forward. Could see Kulak coming back, actually.
User avatar
Alexei Ca$hin
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:12 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#103 Post by Alexei Ca$hin »

Nurse is still decent. Just horribly misclassed as a #1 pair guy and overpaid. Perfect candidate for a fresh start.
User avatar
Alexei Ca$hin
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2024 11:12 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#104 Post by Alexei Ca$hin »

Lol Nick Suzuki with 1 first place vote for the Hart. McDavid with 68 3rd - 5th place votes. Great league, great system.
User avatar
nick
Posts: 446
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:59 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#105 Post by nick »

Kucherov was left off of 2 ballots entirely; Mackinnon left off of 3
User avatar
sutterfamily
Posts: 1124
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:46 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#106 Post by sutterfamily »

I also don't understand how Jon Cooper wins best coach if he ALSO had the MVP and MVG. Like, pick maybe 2 of three?
User avatar
nick
Posts: 446
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2024 9:59 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#107 Post by nick »

Seems like Lindy Ruff and Dan Muse split the "this team was supposed to be bad but were actually good" vote (with a bunch of other guys getting first place votes too), allowing Cooper to come up the middle for what amounts to a lifetime achievement award more than anything.

Also, pretty bad that 40 broadcasters with voting privileges on this one didn't even submit a ballot?
User avatar
neuartillery
Site Admin
Posts: 7486
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#108 Post by neuartillery »

nick wrote: Fri Jun 12, 2026 11:13 am Seems like Lindy Ruff and Dan Muse split the "this team was supposed to be bad but were actually good" vote (with a bunch of other guys getting first place votes too), allowing Cooper to come up the middle for what amounts to a lifetime achievement award more than anything.
That makes sense. Cooper may be the best coach in the sport and his not getting a Jack Adams until this point was an oversight, but that award almost always goes to a "surprise good" team's coach.

I don't know if there was a clear best goaltender this year. Looking at the advanced stats, maybe Logan Thompson, but the Vezina is rarely given to a goalie whose team didn't make the playoffs. So that cuts him, Sorokin, and Shesterkin out. Wedgewood was a platoon guy. I guess that leaves Vasi as the best classical candidate.

As for the Hart, I would've given it to McDavid. That one feels like voter fatigue.
User avatar
neuartillery
Site Admin
Posts: 7486
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#109 Post by neuartillery »

1. Torts isn't returning to Vegas, a little surprised by this but maybe three months is the ideal amount of Torts

2. "The Toronto Maple Leafs traded goaltender Joseph Woll and defenseman Simon Benoit to the Philadelphia Flyers in exchange for defenseman Emil Andrae, goaltender Samuel Ersson and a third-round pick in the 2026 NHL Draft"

I don't get it? Ersson real bad, Andrae is OK as a small, offensively inclined defenseman on the third pair or in the press box.
User avatar
sutterfamily
Posts: 1124
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:46 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#110 Post by sutterfamily »

how could toronto trade the best 6th defenceman in hockey, how
User avatar
sutterfamily
Posts: 1124
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:46 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#111 Post by sutterfamily »

neuartillery wrote: Tue Jun 16, 2026 1:27 pm 1. Torts isn't returning to Vegas, a little surprised by this but maybe three months is the ideal amount of Torts
This is pretty funny. My read: the egotistical blowhard management (McCrimmon) doesn't wanna give Torts (the other egotistical blowhard) any of the credit for this run.
practice
Posts: 1250
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#112 Post by practice »

Goalies just aren't worth much I guess? I don't get it either but trades are fun and it's cool the pick is a 2026
practice
Posts: 1250
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#113 Post by practice »

There are so many worst case ontario moments over th past decade for the Leafs that one that I think goes under the radar is the dying seconds of game 6 in 2023 vs Boston when Woll was about to post a shutout but the Leafs players on the ice stopped playing with a couple seconds left on th clock giving some Boston scrub a clear seam pass to another one who buried it, and Woll injured himself trying to save it and preserve the shutout. All of this leads to Samsonov starting game 7 instead
practice
Posts: 1250
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#114 Post by practice »

One thing I like about this trade is it will put my belief in my own certainties to the test. I think Benoit maybe was once a serviceable 6/7 in a playoff series where refs aren't calling penalties, last year he was the worst player on the team by far. If he ends up contributing to a good season in Philly I will be totally rudderless,l
User avatar
neuartillery
Site Admin
Posts: 7486
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#115 Post by neuartillery »

I’ve gotten a few of those “hmm maybe the player isn’t bad, it’s the team I like” revelations over the last year with the Wings. Do not like.
User avatar
neuartillery
Site Admin
Posts: 7486
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#116 Post by neuartillery »

Leaves think outside of the box, hire former Kings coach / Leaves assistant Jim Hiller as coach
practice
Posts: 1250
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:18 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#117 Post by practice »

it's a low bar but I'm glad it's not a 5 year deal or something for a big name/Cassidy. Mirtle has said a few times that the Babcock salary still being on the books 4 years after they fired him made it really difficult for the GM to get approval to fire the next coach. I like that presumably this new coach will be easier to replace with another coach, when the time comes.
User avatar
neuartillery
Site Admin
Posts: 7486
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#118 Post by neuartillery »

"On the plus side, no one will miss him when he's gone" is among the saddest reactions to a coaching hire I can think of
User avatar
neuartillery
Site Admin
Posts: 7486
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:46 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#119 Post by neuartillery »

The San Jose Sharks acquired Buffalo Sabres defenseman Michael Kesselring and the Sabres’ first-round selection in the 2026 NHL Draft for the Sharks’ No. 20 pick.

Makes sense from both sides, Kesselring didn't seem to fit in Buffalo but is almost assuredly a top-four D in SJ
User avatar
sutterfamily
Posts: 1124
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:46 am

Re: 2026 NHL Offseason Thread: Larkin or Lark-OUT?

#120 Post by sutterfamily »

That seems like a lot to give up for Buffalo tho - they move up 7 spots but still firmly in long-shot/project territory and give away a serviceable (if poor fitting) NHL D? (not complaining)
Post Reply